Work Platform Firm Engagement Start a conversation
IVBIS / Firm
The firm

A small, senior
engineering firm.
Built differently on purpose.

No bench. No internal sales org. No "we'll bring in a senior" stage gate. The engineers you meet are the engineers on the work. The platform compounds in the background.

The model

Engineering leverage. Not engineering headcount.

Most engineering firms scale by adding people. A new client means a new bench. A larger engagement means more juniors under a senior banner. The economics work because utilization works — and utilization works because the firm can always find another billable hour to fill.

We chose a different shape. The firm scales by adding leverage: a proprietary AI platform, reusable agents and playbooks, the seven-graph governance surface that became ArchTrace, the lineage spine that became PlanTrace. Hiring is selective and senior — additions are made around the platform, not around the next engagement.

The platform is the firm. The engineers are what makes it accountable.

The visible part of that choice is what we don't do. No bench. No internal sales organisation. No multi-tier delivery model. No "we'll bring in a senior architect for the cutover" stage gate. The price of an engagement is the price of the named team, in writing, before the work starts.

The structural part is the more interesting one. A firm built on headcount needs to keep its people billable, which determines what kind of work it can say no to — which is to say, not much. A firm built on leverage can afford to be selective about the work, because the work isn't the only thing the firm is. That selectivity is, in practice, the entire reason a client would prefer us to a larger vendor.

The platform isn't a product line on the side. It is the central asset, extended by every engagement and licensed back into every engagement. When the next migration starts further down the road than the last one did, the savings flow to the client. When the platform gets stronger, every engineer in the firm gets faster. That's the compounding mechanic. It is the entire reason the model works.

The competitive frame

Where IVBIS sits in the actual market.

A short comparison against the two categories the buyer is otherwise weighing us against. We don't claim to win on everything — only on the column shape that matches the kind of work we take.

 
Big SI
AI dev shop
IVBIS
Scales by
Adding headcount
Generating code
Compounding IP
Production posture
Process-heavy
Demo-heavy
Governance + speed
Legacy depth
Yes, but slow
No
Yes, and accelerated
Greenfield speed
Slow under process
Fast until UAT
Fast and gated
AI posture
Cautious, late
Maximalist, ungoverned
Heavy use, human gate
Where value goes
Billable hours
Code delivered
Reusable AI IP + delivered code
The team

A few names. The ones on the work.

Bios lead with systems, not titles. The engagement you sign starts with these people — not with a sales motion that hands you off to others once the contract clears procurement.

AM FIG · TEAL

A. Müller

Founder · Senior architect

Twenty years across SAP S/4HANA, Oracle EBS, and the kind of European public-sector estates that survive entire generations of consulting firms. Owns architecture and the cutover conversation.

JS FIG · BLUE

J. Singh

Co-founder · Platform

Built the seven-graph governance surface that became ArchTrace and the lineage spine that became PlanTrace. Owns the platform and where the AI loop ends.

LC FIG · AMBER

L. Chen

Senior engineer · Greenfield

Production-grade greenfield delivery across regulated lines — insurance, fintech, energy. Owns delivery, cutover, and the on-call rotation that comes after.

If you start an engagement with us, you work with people on this page. There is no "we'll bring in a senior" stage gate. That's the entire model.

The firm

Small team. Strong engineers. Compounding platform.

Start with a sentence about what you're trying to build, modernize, or unbreak.
We reply within two business days.